LA LOGICA È EMPIRICA?


Abstract Views: 827
PDF: 1200
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

We owe to Hilary Putnam, among many other things, one of the most interesting revision of classical logic ever proposed; according to the author – or at least according to some of his temporal parts – we should abandon the distributive law in light of some quantum mechanics’ results. After having presented Putnam’s ideas (§1), and having set them within the philosophy of logic’s framework (§2), I will discuss one of the main arguments ever presented against the possibility of modifying logic on empirical bases, namely what Putnam himself has labeled ‘the centrality argument’ (§3). I will maintain that if this argument is correct then Putnam’s proposal – other than because of the criticisms that can be leveled at it from the point of view of the physical theories – fails for purely philosophical and logical reasons.

Sforza Fogliani, M. P. (2017). LA LOGICA È EMPIRICA?. Istituto Lombardo - Accademia Di Scienze E Lettere • Incontri Di Studio. https://doi.org/10.4081/incontri.2017.288

Downloads

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations